These experiments suggest that x-ray-induced mosaic mutations become established primarily at the first synchronous nuclear division of the zygote and that the ICR 100-induced mosaic mutations become established primarily at a later replication. Mutation frequencies at 16 other loci expressing visible effects were low or negligible. More than 90% of the recovered dumpy mutations are distributed mosaically in somatic and gonadal tissues. Monofunctional quinacrine mustard (ICR 100) induces mutations at the dumpy locus with an average frequency of 0.88%. Reasons are discussed why for other types of mutagenic agents nonrandom distributions may be observed with our technique. The results obtained in the mitomycin C and radiation experiments favor the assumption of a random intercellular distribution of recessive lethal mutations induced by these two agents in oocytes of D. All of the 50 mutations observed after x irradiation were single mutations. After mitomycin C feeding 104 single and three double mutations were obtained. melanogaster without mutagenic treatment was obtained (u = 0.13%, namely three single mutations among 2332 chromosomes tested). After FUdR feeding, no increase in the mutation frequency usually observed in D. more » Three agents were tested: FUdR (12.5, 50.0 and 81.0. A theory is developed to show how a comparison betweeen the expected and the observer frequency of double mutations yields an indication of the intercellular distribution (random or nonrandom) of recessive lethal mutations induced by mutagenic agents in oocytes and, consequently, of the distribution (homogenous or nonhomogeneous) of those agents. A method is described that discriminates between such single and double mutations. When females of Drosophila melanogaster are treated with chemical or physical mutagens, not only in one but also in both of the two homologous X chromosomes of a given oocyte, a recessive sex-linked lethal mutation may be induced. Mathews et al, “Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians.= , You can find my specific recommendations about antioxidants here. To reduce the damage radiation exposure poses I suggest eating a plant-based diet high in protective phytonutrients and taking antioxidant supplements. However, on average these cases represent a minority of the health problems most physicians see. Bear in mind that these tests may be necessary for diagnosing severe illness and injury and determining the best treatments for diseases involving vital organs and for other dire conditions. To avoid unnecessary exposure to radiation from X-rays and CT scans be sure to ask why a test is recommended, how the results will affect your treatment, and what would happen if you don’t have it. Because of their continuing risk, we don’t know how many of these young people will develop cancer over their lifetime as a result of their radiation exposure as children. Children who had CT scans before age five had a 35 percent increased risk. An Australian study published in 2013 determined that children and adolescents who had one CT scan from birth to age 19 had a 24 percent increased risk of cancer, and that each additional scan bumped the risk up another 16 percent. You probably wouldn’t connect a CT scan to the disease since it can take up to 60 years for cancer stemming from radiation exposure to develop, depending on your other risks. These changes eventually can lead to cancer. One CT scan can harm tissue and create free radicals that can set off chain reactions that damage cells. A single CT procedure can give you a radiation dose equivalent to 200 chest X-rays. Women between age 50 and 74 are advised to consider having a mammogram every two years.ĬT scans are a different story. Mammograms also give you a relatively low dose of radiation, 0.4 milliseverts, which is equal to seven weeks’ worth of exposure to natural sources of radiation, such as radon gas. However, unless you develop a dental problem requiring more frequent monitoring, you can safely forego annual x-rays and opt instead to have them once every two or three years. According to a 2015 Consumer Reports investigation, these expose the average-size adult to a 0.005-millisevert dose of radiation, which is a very small amount. As for dental x-rays, most people don’t need them every year.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |